Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinkign
Rating: (out of 1162 reviews) Price: BUY: Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinkign Related Blogs...
Rating: 
(out of 1162 reviews)
Price:
BUY: Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinkign
Online shopping for millions of new & used books on thousands of topics at everyday low prices.
Review by E. Freeman for Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinkign
Rating:
Well, as the outrageous air blower of Gladwell’s final book, The Tipping Point, you was vehement final week to eventually get my hands upon his latest effort: Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. This time around Gladwell’s simple subject is which mostly snap judgements (what he calls “thin slicing”) can be some-more correct than good researched, clever analysis. Gladwell uses many examples (most have been interesting) to denote this function such as last when art is faked, sizing up automobile buyers, picking presidential possibilities as good as last the characteristics of the chairman by watching their vital space. This has regularly been Gladwell’s talent: receiving just-under-the-radar topics as good as bringing them in to the public’s perspective by good broadcasting as good as storytelling.
Gladwell is additionally clever to inspect the flipside of this phenomenon: the times when “thin slicing” misleads us or gives us the wrong results. For instance, he presents examples where the thoughts functions formed upon biases which do not indispensably come in the area of unwavering thought, though have been though there (age, race, height, as good as so on).
It’s the good subject as good as Gladwell sets it up with the small smashing examples, though afterwards the book starts to have problems. First, the book is the small as good anecdotal. Anyone who has ever had the 200-level psych category knows which what looks similar to means as good as outcome might be accounted for by an eccentric non-static which wasn’t deliberate (e.g., final cancer rates have been aloft in the small area of the nation since of pollution, when in actuality the area has aloft smoking rates as well). Given this, you found which as good mostly conclusions have been done upon simple handwaving, or which critical aspects of studies have been not mentioned. For instance, Gladwell describes the investigate were observers have been asked to establish sure characteristics (such as truthfulness, consciensciousness, etc.) of students by watching their dorm rooms; but, never does he discuss how only the single would establish these characteristics of people in the systematic demeanour for comparison. Such omissions leave the reader the small reduction than convinced.
Nevertheless, even with this smirch the initial third of the book supports the subject as good as creates for the common engaging reading; though things derail from there. The examples begin to appear some-more peripheral: the brute commander in chief violence the required forces in the fight diversion exercise, an artist well known as Kenna who assumingly should have done it large though didn’t (why this e.g. is engaging I’ve nonetheless to figure out), as good as the small rehash about coke vs pepsi from the single of his comparison articles.
By the finish of the book the total thing derails in to examples which only do not appear suitable for the topic. Sure the investigate of because Pepsi regularly does improved than Coke in blind tastes tests is engaging (and you can review his essay upon this though shopping the book upon Gladwell’s web site), though does the investigate of “sips” vs “whole-can drinking” – people cite honeyed for sips (Pepsi) – unequivocally contend something about comatose fast cognition?
One of Gladwell’s biggest strengths is in noticing engaging things, as good as afterwards bringing them in to unwavering recognition so you essentially comprehend these things have been function (whether it be tipping points or fast cognition). you consider he’s partly completed which in this book, though it doesn’t come together the approach the Tipping Point does. One gets the thought which this subject might have been improved rubbed in an essay rsther than than the full blown book.
Review by Eric Antonow for Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinkign
Rating:
The inapplicable designation was as well try as well as get all of these furious animals onto a same boat. The book a array of semi-socio-scientific articles upon discernment as well as intuition. It is not a cohesive theory.
The essay is beguiling – we review a most of it in a singular craft flight. Some of a insights yield structure blocks for bargain how sure professionals (people who use a theme or ability for most years) have been means to rise an one some-more clarity about things — gamblers, art curators, policemen. They have been radically saying something which doesn’t register during a conscious-level though provides them a gut-feel about a thing. Actually, we should contend which these articles have been how this MIGHT be function – it’s some-more conjecture formed upon a opposite theories of a series of opposite researchers. Individually a stories as well as ideas have been believable. Unfortuately, Gladwell fumbles in perplexing take them in to a little one conjecture which is distinct let alone cohesive — during times we consternation “where is he starting with this?”. Without which thread a indivudal beads get mislaid as well as blur in to mental recall as crafty ideas…and not most more. Without certainty in a grand idea, a particular pieces proceed to feel simply exploratory. It’s a contrition since there have been a little conspicuous ideas. He’s a great documenter of curiousities of investigate (sort of similar to a Ken Burns is to chronological things) so a storytelling is great sufficient for entertainment. Another reviewer likened it a addage about Chinese food, juicy though inspired an hour later. we agree. Flawed though still a little engaging ideas to nonplus over.
Review by Louis Gudema for Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinkign
Rating:
I am the great suitor of Malcolm Gladwell’s writing, carrying review him for years in “The New Yorker” as good as amatory “The Tipping Point,” his progressing book. But “Blink” is no “Tipping Point.”
The suspicion here is which people mostly have discerning initial impressions which have been some-more current as good as profitable than delicately considered, well-thought-out, researched conclusions. Except when they aren’t, since initial impressions of individuals, for example, can be dark by (and Gladwell even discusses this) such counts as attractiveness, gender, competition — as good as even tallness (what Gladwell calls the “Warren Harding” error). And how have been we to know when the quick-as-a-blink greeting is current as good as when it isn’t? Well, that’s the complaint with the book. Ever gifted love-at-first-sight as good as afterwards satisfied the chairman wasn’t unequivocally all we suspicion s/he was…?
This complete book flies in the face of an glorious essay Gladwell wrote in 2000 called “The New-Boy Network” [...] about how meaningless the standard pursuit talk is (because it relies as good most upon tummy impressions) as good as how “structured interviews” have been the usually inestimable ones (an mention from the article: “This interviewing technique is good known as “structured interviewing,” as good as in studies by industrial psychologists it has been shown to be the usually kind of interviewing which has any success during all in presaging opening in the workplace. In the structured interviews, the format is sincerely rigid. Each person submitting application is treated with colour in precisely the same manner. The questions have been scripted. The interviewers have been delicately trained, as good as any person submitting application is rated upon the array of fixed scales.”)
Even examples he uses in this book have been not unequivocally on-target, such as the Red/Blue troops practice he spends the substantial volume of time discussing. He implies regularly which the feat of the Reds was due to thin-slicing as good as their discerning judgments, though by his own outline the lot of well-thought-out vital decisions about communications, etc., unequivocally were during the heart of the victory, not discerning decisions done in the wink of an eye.
On the alternative site of the premonition vs. research coin, the unequivocally great review is Michael Lewis’s “Moneyball.” Central to which book, with applications good over the ball setting, is the fulfilment which the tummy reactions of seasoned ball scouts have been mostly unreliable, being dark by how the player looks rsther than than his tangible on-field accomplishments. A some-more methodical proceed has helped Oakland have the playoffs regularly with the income the third (now the quarter) which of the Yankees — as good as additionally was during the heart of ubiquitous physical education instructor Theo Epstein’s player moves which helped the Red Sox win the World Series.
Gladwell positively loves the amicable sciences, as good as runs all over the landscape deliberating assorted experiments, theories, etc., though it doesn’t unequivocally come together here similar to it did in “The Tipping Point,” or in most of his articles. My “thin slice” (as Gladwell would say): the disappointment.
Review by S. Marshall for Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinkign
Rating:
One anecdotal story after an additional with a diseased end (which was nonetheless an additional anecdotal story) attempting to tie it all up left me flat. Here’s my summary: All we need to know is “Don’t decider a book by a cover.” well… unless you’re an consultant of a little sort. In that case, we can certitude your primary reaction, since you’re substantially right. Well… unless you’ve paid courtesy to a wrong things… in that box we have been proabably wrong. So, Don’t decider a book by a cover – ESPECIALLY THIS BOOK!! You will see it upon a bestseller list as well as pretence it is value celebration of a mass (as The Tipping Point arguably was) rsther than than a weak, clearly rushed try to float upon a coattails of his progressing success.
Review by Michael Erisman for Blink : The Power of Thinking Without Thinkign
Rating:
This is a single of a many erotically appealing books you have review in a small time. The book centers upon a judgment of how quick you unequivocally do have judgments, called “thin slicing”, as good as how deeper research can infrequently yield reduction report than more. It is all about cognitive speed.
The judgment of “thin slicing” is dissected as good as explained. What you found fascinating, as good as additionally usual sense, is which you routine report upon a subliminal level, “behind a door”, as good as routine so holistically which to over investigate can radically impede a capability to have decisions.
Several pass points have been germane in business. One of a in abyss studies looked during a troops personality who was quite successful. One of his some-more touching observations was which a good personality needs to let a people do their work. When determining how mostly to follow up “you have been ludicrous them, right away they have been seeking ceiling instead of downward. You have been preventing them from solution a situation”. (Page 118) Further “allowing people to work but carrying to insist themselves all a time … enables fast cognition” (Page 119). It seems which many micro-management radically prevents people from successful preference making.
Another bizarre materialisation occurs when you try as good as insist how you come to a small conclusions. It seems which a some-more you try to investigate how you come to a small conclusions a reduction arguable they become.
The capability to catch as good as acknowledge notation changes in facial expressions allows us to radically “read minds” if you compensate attention. There have been multiform chapters upon how arguable you can be in presaging function with really small information.
Overall, this book is so good created which you had a tough time putting it down. My usually compliant, as good as it is a teenager one, is which a book only ends. No outline or hang up, only “boom”, it’s over. However, which is some-more a covenant to how enchanting a book is you suppose. Highly recommended!